Pay attention To The Episode Right here:
On this episode of “Bitcoin, Defined,” hosts Aaron van Wirdum and Sjors Provoost focus on a latest weblog publish by Jameson Lopp titled, “Has Bitcoin Ever Laborious Forked?”
Laborious forks are usually outlined as Bitcoin protocol upgrades that take away or loosen guidelines, making a majority of these upgrades backwards-incompatible. Van Wirdum and Provoost clarify, nonetheless, that in his weblog publish, Lopp argues that this definition isn’t very exact and means that the time period ought to solely apply if the rule change was truly utilized. As well as, exhausting forks may be categorized into express exhausting forks, the place the rule change was an intentional exhausting fork, and implicit exhausting forks, the place the rule change wasn’t initially supposed to be a tough fork in any respect however turned out to be one anyway.
Within the second half of the podcast, van Wirdum and Provoost break down the seven exhausting forks in Bitcoin’s historical past that Lopp was capable of finding and focus on, 5 of which had been by no means utilized (and will due to this fact arguably not be thought-about exhausting forks in any respect), one in all them was express and one other one was implicit.
To finish the episode, van Wirdum and Provoost briefly focus on the “exhausting fork want checklist” of future exhausting fork(s) that want(s) to occur with the intention to repair a time worth bug, and what sort of philosophy round deploying exhausting forks may make sense for Bitcoin with regard to including extra facets to a obligatory change within the code.